RESEARCH ARTICLE
Diabetics Under Report Energy Intake in NHANES III Greater than Non-Diabetics
Michael E. Broyles, Robin Harris, Douglas L. Taren*
Article Information
Identifiers and Pagination:
Year: 2008Volume: 2
First Page: 54
Last Page: 62
Publisher Id: TONUTRJ-2-54
DOI: 10.2174/1874288200802010054
Article History:
Received Date: 28/11/2007Revision Received Date: 28/04/2008
Acceptance Date: 06/06/2008
Electronic publication date: 26/6/2008
Collection year: 2008
open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Known factors associated with under-reporting energy intake (EI) include anthropometry, energy expenditure, psychological factors, smoking, and gender. There is insufficient information on the association between chronic disease status and under-reporting EI. Using NHANES III data from non-pregnant adults aged ≥ 20 years, reported EI was estimated from a single 24-hour dietary recall and compared with estimated basal metabolic rate (BMRest) among 1503 diabetics and 17,010 non-diabetics. Multiple linear regression and logistic regression were performed to compare underreporting between diabetics and non-diabetics, and if it was associated with a hemoglobin A1c within diabetics.
Using EI:BMRest < 0.9, male and female diabetics were 2.1 and 3.4 times as likely to under report EI compared to nondiabetics after controlling for weight, age, education, usual intake level, physical activity, tobacco and alcohol use. This greater under-reporting by diabetics could bias the association between diet and disease toward the null in epidemiological studies.